2:01
Ben Clemens: Hey everybody, welcome to my final chat of the 12 months
2:02
Ben Clemens: 2024 was an superior 12 months of baseball, and I’m going to recollect it fairly fondly, so in case you have any 12 months in evaluation sort questions, ship them my means
2:03
Ben Clemens: within the meantime, let’s reply some common questions
2:03
Sig Mejdal: ought to I recover from it and commerce Coby mayo for an SP like Stop or Castillo? Or hoard prospects and hope they work out and signal a lesser SP like Flaherty?
2:03
Balmore Invoice: What are we doing?! Can we not commerce extra from our massive league roster (Mountcastle, Heston, Ramon urias) and/or prospects for pitching? Is anybody apart from Jackson and basallo off limits? Who ought to we goal?
2:03
Ben Clemens: Ah sure, “Right here’s Ramon Urias, give me the perfect pitcher you possibly can for him”
2:03
Ben Clemens: sadly, that wouldn’t get too far
2:03
Ben Clemens: I believe that the O’s are in an fascinating spot. The actual factor I need them to do is signal some gamers to extensions
2:04
Ben Clemens: I appreciated their commerce for Burnes, for instance, and I wouldn’t hate seeing them replicate that, however one factor I really feel very positive about is that they shouldn’t do half measures
2:04
Ben Clemens: Half of Adley’s staff management is gone. 1/3 of Gunnar’s. You’ve a uncommon alternative. The current issues
2:04
El Tim: If Shohei pitches most of a full season at an aceish degree, may he win Comeback Participant of the Yr the season after successful back-to-back unanimous MVPs? Appears very on-brand.
2:05
Zilko: I do know all of it is determined by worth, nevertheless it feels just like the Pink Sox ought to double down and get Burnes, no? Saved cash by buying and selling for Crochet, a number of elite place participant prospects on the cusp of the MLB. Burnes-Crochet 1-2 feels prefer it will get you fairly dang far in each the common and postseason.
2:05
Ben Clemens: I believe that they’re in want of extra gamers
2:05
Ben Clemens: pitcher? Bregman? Teo? I don’t have a brilliant sturdy tackle which choice they need to take
2:05
Ben Clemens: however this isn’t an amazing staff as it’s
2:05
Nickles: Will the Yanks remorse not topping the Cubs provide for Tucker? Reportedly they balked at Gil and Lombardi.
2:06
Ben Clemens: If that reporting is true, I believe that was an enormous error on their half
2:06
Ben Clemens: they even have nice proof of how properly a commerce for a FA-to-be celebrity can work out
2:06
Pitchers Listing: Why is the SP market a lot hotter this 12 months than final, when Snell and Montgomery signed so late? Are groups prioritizing clear Sport 1/2 playoff starters, no matter worth or age? Whereas the pen market has been sluggish to develop. An fascinating shift from the current mantra to not overpay pitchers…
2:07
Ben Clemens: Yeah, I’m stunned. I assume we’ll have to attend for another prime hitters to signal to see whether or not it’s the entire market being scorching or simply the pitchers who’ve signed to date
2:07
Child: In a vacuum, ought to the Mets (a) resign Pete, (b) signal Bregman and shift Vientos, or (c) handle the void through commerce (e.g., Arenado)?
2:08
Ben Clemens: I believe I like B most of those choices
2:08
Ben Clemens: nevertheless it relies upon what the marketplace for Arenado appears to be like like
2:09
Davy Andrews: Hey Ben, simply needed to let you already know that you simply seem within the background proper across the 2:30 mark of the video clip on the prime of this text.
2:09
Ben Clemens: Hey Davy! Spectacular spot
2:09
Ben Clemens: I puzzled what sort of angle these cameras have been capturing, I assume now I do know
2:10
Ben Clemens: I really feel like they have been completely positioned to cdatch the whole lot of the gang milling round
2:10
AAAA: Solely two defensive shift violations have been referred to as final season (each after supervisor challenges and each within the span of ~every week)–does that appear low?
2:10
Ben Clemens: not likely… you possibly can simply have a look at the place you’re standing, which appears to make it so much tougher to by chance run afoul of
2:10
Visitor: Does anybody know the principles by which staff names reference a metropolis or state? May the As theoretically briefly rebrand because the Sacramento As?
2:10
Ben Clemens: I imagine they might have, becuase they selected to simply be referred to as the athletics as an alternative of including at eam title
2:10
Ben Clemens: a metropolis title, fairly
2:11
TKDC: I like the Stroll-Off function you all added, although I’m a little bit unhappy I got here one proportion level in need of platinum standing. Are you aware what number of days have been lined by it? I do know it’s in need of a full 12 months, and I simply needed to know what number of days I didn’t go to Fangraphs?
2:11
Ben Clemens: I believe we minimize it off two Saturdays in the past
2:11
TheBeatlesShow: Hey, Ben. Brent Rooker good for 50 HR’s in Sacramento? Completely satisfied holidays.
2:11
Ben Clemens: that may be a LOT of residence runs
2:12
Ben Clemens: greater than Statcast thinks he would have hit if he performed the entire season in Cincy final 12 months
2:12
Ben Clemens: so I’m gonna say no. I don’t assume the park goes to be the perfect hitter’s park in baseball or something. Only a lot friendlier than the Coliseum
2:13
Justin: Kyle Tucker: set-your-watch-by-him 5 battle all star, or going-forward 8 battle superstud?
2:13
Ben Clemens: for me, the primary
2:13
Ben Clemens: show the second earlier than I’m prepared to imagine it, you already know?
2:14
Justin: Greatest christmas music?
2:14
Ben Clemens: I’ve just a few contenders, I’ll give my spouse credit score for these as a result of I wasn’t an enormous Christmas music individual as a child
2:15
Ben Clemens: Christmas Wrapping by the Waitresses, Merry Christmas by Elton John and Ed Sheeran, Fairytale of New York by the Pogues, and all the Sia Christmas album are my go tos
2:15
Ryan: Pink Sox don’t have a shortstop. Dbacks have two. Dbacks additionally want a primary baseman. Who says no to a Geraldo Perdomo for Tristian Casas commerce?
2:15
Ben Clemens: by like, so much
2:16
Ben Clemens: I believe Casas is simply higher along with having an additional 12 months of management
2:16
Visitor: Put up Kyle Tucker commerce: The Cubs outfield is LOADED. Do you assume Bellinger/Suzuki are most certainly to be moved?
2:17
Ben Clemens: Sure I do. Final week, Seiya’s agent talked about that he was not desirous about being a full-time DH, and that he’d particularly appeared to keep away from that when he signed his free company contract
2:17
Ben Clemens: I believe that places them in an enormous bind, tbh
2:18
Ben Clemens: there’s simply nowhere for him to play. I believe that they’re going to finish up buying and selling him, in all probability for not that a lot as a result of it’s an ungainly marketplace for nook OF bats with some good free brokers accessible for contending groups nonetheless
2:18
Ben Clemens: I’d make a transfer to get Kyle Tucker each time nonetheless, however they undoubtedly have to make some extra strikes given present roster development
2:19
drhotdog: as an angels fan ive been dreading a nolan areando commerce. is there a commerce you assume could possibly be win-win? cuz i solely see catastrophe brewing
2:19
Ben Clemens: no. Arenado to the Angels solely is smart as a result of he’s from there
2:20
Ben Clemens: I like that he talked about how a lot he needed to win, then gave a listing of groups that had a bunch of groups that eclipsed .500 and have legit WS aspirations
2:20
Ben Clemens: after which the Angels
2:20
Ben Clemens: like, you possibly can simply say you want the place you’re from, that’s okay too
2:20
Justin: Everyone knows the Pirates aren’t gonna provide sufficient {dollars} for teoscar/santander, the primary cleanup model nook OFs in FA. Aav in all probability 20-30. Assuming they might afford a AAV nearer to 10-20, who’re some commerce targets who make sense?
2:20
Ben Clemens: what about Seiya???
2:20
Justin: What are your ideas on the Horwitz deal from the pirates POV? Strong sufficient leadoff hitter at 1b for just a few years?
2:21
Ben Clemens: that is the sort of commerce you make when you already know you’re not going to spend any actual cash in FA, for my part
2:21
Ben Clemens: he’s a superbly cheap blah bat, if he finally ends up as a rotational participant that’s advantageous
2:21
Ben Clemens: for those who’re relying on him as certainly one of your finest hitters, you probably did one thing unsuitable
2:21
Yeah Nicely Hiura Towel: Even with Soto, the Mets nonetheless want pitching. They’ve obtained Senga and a bunch of query marks. Is that this staff actually a contender with out additional additions?
2:21
Ben Clemens: I imply…. why would we count on no additional additions
2:22
Ben Clemens: It’s December 16 and 17 of the highest 50 free brokers have signed
2:22
Ben Clemens: ‘is that this staff actually a contender’ yeah the staff that simply made the NLCS, signed Juan Soto, and nonetheless has a payroll practically 100 million decrease than final 12 months’s is a contender
2:23
RetireNutting: WRT your O’s Adley window response…aren’t the Pirates in an analogous spot with Skenes’ window only a few years earlier? Couldn’t the 2 groups match up properly on say a (certainly one of) Jared Jones/Mitch Keller for Coby Mayo kind of deal together with different items to make it work?
2:23
Ben Clemens: I don’t actually perceive why the Pirates would do that
2:23
Ben Clemens: I imply, except the O’s simply bowled them over with worth. However the O’s don’t try this. they particularly attempt to win each commerce
2:23
Thanks for the chat!: Within the case of Bellinger, can money be conditionally added to the deal based mostly on decide in years?
2:24
Ben Clemens: It might. The Arenado-to-the-Playing cards deal had the Rockies kicking in a distinct amount of money based mostly on whether or not he exercised his decide out. Equally, the Mets had some conditional money on Verlander’s commerce to the Astros
2:24
Sizzling Range Please: What was probably the most impactful commerce of 2024?
2:24
Ben Clemens: The preseason Soto commerce
2:24
Ben Clemens: not solely did it spearhead the Yankees, nevertheless it gave the Padres a head begin on rebuilding their rotation, and the 2 mixed had enormous impacts in each leagues
2:25
Sirras: What was probably the most shocking second of 2024 for you? Most shocking storyline?
2:25
Ben Clemens: Shohei going 50/50 shocked me. I didn’t even take into account him a contender for it
2:25
Ben Clemens: I believe that probably the most shocking storyline for me was Skenes turning into the perfect pitcher in baseball (ish)
2:25
Ben Clemens: I used to be too low on him heading into the 12 months
2:25
Colton: The information that the Astros are in on the Arenado sweepstakes (if that’s what we’re calling them I assume) was not shocking, however the timing appeared off with the shifting Tucker instantly earlier than it got here out. Any concepts on a possible return for him can be when the Cardinals transfer him?
2:26
Ben Clemens: Yeah…. actually I may completely see this, the Astros appear to be going full thrift mode out of nowhere
2:26
Ben Clemens: and possibly they will get the Cardinals to eat a bunch of cash, kick in some prospects, and try this
2:26
Ben Clemens: one factor I’m interested by is whether or not they assume Paredes can play third
2:27
Ben Clemens: I believe he can, and if he’s na common defender on the market, I don’t fairly perceive the impetus to maneuver a bunch of items to get Arenado
2:27
Ben Clemens: but when they assume he’s higher fitted to first base, then I prefer it extra
2:27
SPArn: Did you get a adequate (literal) have a look at Andres Chaparro in his cup of espresso final season to audibly giggle on the “If Chaparro can play third base” qualifier in at the moment’s ZIPS Nationals write up?
2:27
Ben Clemens: I watched a whole lot of Nats video games within the second half of the 12 months
2:28
Dan’l: What do you suppose is the first cause for the Playing cards to maneuver Arenado this offseason? Wage reduction? Honor his want for a successful staff? There’s an opportunity Arenado is value extra subsequent offseason, as his common wage is decrease and possibly (?) his offense improves in 2025.
2:28
Ben Clemens: Yeah, wage reduction and since he requested to be traded
2:28
Troy: The mariners appear to have put it on the market that they might commerce Luis Castillo for actual impression, seemingly at 3B or 2B. Do you assume that commerce really exists? It’s arduous to examine prying guys like Westburg or Mayo (who may not even be 3B) from Os or Vientos from the Mets
2:28
Ben Clemens: Nah, I don’t see it occurring
2:28
Ben Clemens: The Mariners may at all times fully change their methods, nevertheless it’s clear that they worth pitching EXTREMELY extremely
2:29
Ben Clemens: so positive, they might commerce Castillo for actual impression
2:29
Ben Clemens: however they could assume actual impression is like, Brice Turang + Joey Ortiz
2:29
Impartial Followers Fan: Which staff has the perfect bandwagoners to haters ratio going into 2025?
2:29
Ben Clemens: the Padres, possibly?
2:29
Ben Clemens: it’s query
2:30
Danny G100: I’d prefer to push again on the Suzuki factor… I believe he’s the 2nd finest hitter on the staff and might actually break up time with Tucker in proper subject. As a cubs fan I’d take so much in return like strong third baseman or a prime 2 starter on the rotation
2:30
Ben Clemens: okay, what if he tells you “I don’t need to play DH, I’m requesting a commerce if I’m not going to be an outfielder”
2:30
Ben Clemens: I believe Seiya is nice, I’m persistently making dumb predictions about how good he’ll be
2:30
Ben Clemens: however I don’t know, they’re like a fantasy staff that by chance ended up with 5 first basemen
2:30
Ben Clemens: you possibly can’t simply go eh, it’ll work
2:31
Ben Clemens: I’d desire to have all the good gamers on my staff. however I dunno, are you gonna ask Tucker to DH? Bench Ian Happ?
2:31
Jazzy: Is it tough to maneuver a participant like vientos from third to first?
2:31
Ben Clemens: I don’t imagine so, no
2:31
Ben Clemens: there aren’t a whole lot of examples of men NOT with the ability to adapt to first
2:31
Northside: Why the curiosity in Jesus Luzardo? He’s always injured.
2:32
Ben Clemens: so, I’m with you
2:32
Ben Clemens: I simply don’t see it. However lots of people do
2:32
Ben Clemens: he has electrical stuff and he’s had some good outcomes when he can keep wholesome, which is certainly sometimes
2:32
Jazzy: Do you assume Bergman is starting to say no? I’m not bought on him for the Mets in the event that they go that means?
2:32
john darc: Promote me on the Yankees needing to crawl to Bregman and pay celebrity cash for a man who isn’t producing like a celebrity
2:32
Ben Clemens: alright, I assume the pitch is that this
2:33
Ben Clemens: Bregman’s final three years: 5.4 WAR, 4.5 WAR, 4.1 WAR
2:33
Ben Clemens: Yankees who’ve hit 4.1 WAR in any of the final three years:
2:33
Ben Clemens: Aaron Decide (3x), Juan Soto
2:34
Dan’l: It is not sensible to maintain Helsley, sure?
2:34
Ben Clemens: Not NO sense, however let me put it this fashion: I’d settle for 90 cents on the greenback to commerce him
2:35
Ben Clemens: it’s not out of the query that they’d get a greater return by ready for the deadline, and that’s fascinating to me
2:35
Ben Clemens: however they appear severe sufficient about retooling that protecting a more in-depth, and a dominant one, doesn’t actually monitor with what I’d be making an attempt to do
2:35
SPArn: An actual query – Are you an even bigger believer in Herz, Parker, Irvin, or not one of the above being a member of the following contending Nats rotation? 2026… please? I lean Herz b/c of the bat lacking, regardless that it is available in a bizarre means (I believe he throws one fastball at… 5 totally different velocities?)
2:36
Ben Clemens: I believe it’s Herz? It’s him or Parker for me
2:36
Okra: I believe the Rays may have enormous quantity of rain delays this 12 months which can put an additional pressure on all their pitchers (and sure make them underperform. Do you agree?
2:36
Ben Clemens: I don’t understand how precisely they’re gonna deal with it, however they handle to play FSL video games with out blowing individuals’s arms out
2:36
Ben Clemens: I believe they’ll in all probability have the ability to determine it out, although I do agree that on the margin it gained’t be very best
2:37
Telemachus: Do you assume Milwaukee may have gotten a greater bundle for Williams? A deal together with a prime 100 prospect and different items?
2:37
Ben Clemens: I believe that the deal they obtained is RIGHT according to what they want
2:37
Ben Clemens: they struggled mightily within the rotation final 12 months they usually simply can not afford to signal individuals given their funds constraints
2:37
Ben Clemens: they’re making an attempt to win yearly
2:37
Ben Clemens: they appear to have a window proper now, too: the Cardinals are taking a step again and the opposite groups haven’t fairly gotten issues collectively but
2:38
Ben Clemens: “oh this man is a prime 100 prospect” might be not as interesting to them as a complementary and fairly good prospect (Durbin) plus a rotation starter for this 12 months
2:38
Visitor: I like the best way you characterised the Devin Williams commerce, with the Brewers rotating the wheel of efficient pitchers. However in some unspecified time in the future, for those who simply preserve staying on the similar degree, you’ll at all times get the identical outcomes. Sooner or later, don’t they need to go all-in (or not less than be additive, fairly than making an attempt to take care of established order)?
2:39
Ben Clemens: Philosophical query, actually
2:39
Ben Clemens: Would you fairly get a ton of so-so bites on the apple, or go extra boom-bust?
2:39
Ben Clemens: I keep in mind considering, when the Stearns period began, that his plan of not likely bottoming out and making an attempt to compete straight away was novel and enjoyable
2:39
Ben Clemens: I believe this is perhaps a grass is at all times greener scenario right here. I’m an enormous fan of taking photographs when you possibly can, and I fully agree that the Brewers refuse to try this
2:40
Ben Clemens: however I undoubtedly perceive their perspective
2:40
Ben Clemens: they actually need to be aggressive and produce the followers out yearly
2:40
SPArn: Thanks for all of the enjoyable in chat and on the web site this 12 months. 5 issues was my favourite learn each week. Z Lowe can be proud
2:40
Ben Clemens: Thanks very a lot
2:41
Ben Clemens: 5 issues may be very arduous to jot down, simply because the thought era a part of it takes a really very long time and the giffing isn’t automated, nevertheless it’s additionally my favourite factor to jot down, so it really works out
2:41
SPArn: What are you wanting ahead to most, personally, in 2025?
2:42
Ben Clemens: I’m gonna restrict this to baseball
2:43
Ben Clemens: as a result of if not, it’s my journey to Scandinavia that I’m planning
2:43
Ben Clemens: however: I’m excited to see what Ohtani does again on the mound
2:43
Ben Clemens: and I’m very excited to see a Chapman/Adames infield in individual often
2:43
Danny G100: Any predictions for DeGrom this 12 months? I preserve seeing stuff like he’s nonetheless a prime 7 or 8 pitcher in baseball.
2:44
Ben Clemens: I believe he’ll nonetheless be the perfect pitcher in baseball on a price foundation
2:44
Ben Clemens: I actually don’t know find out how to handicap his well being
2:44
Ben Clemens: I’m going to be very excited to look at, although
2:44
john darc: I used to be apprehensive that might be your reply, that Bregman’s “down years” are nonetheless higher than anyone on the staff not named Decide. I simply fear they’ll need to pay him like a celebrity and it’ll forestall them from going after Tucker in free company as a result of “Oops, we spent all our cash!” pretend austerity nonsense.
2:44
Ben Clemens: yeah I imply, that’s all properly and good, however they can’t run the staff again as is imo
2:44
Ben Clemens: Decide is nice RIGHT NOW
2:44
Ben Clemens: give him some assist
2:45
Henry Dodger: Do you assume subsequent low season’s free agent market is perhaps cooler with the CBA being only one 12 months from carried out, or is there no causation there?
2:45
Ben Clemens: I believe it is determined by how the inner conversations are going, and in addition very importantly on how the television deal fallout is that time
2:45
Proper Subject: Tucker put up a 180RC+ final 12 months with good fielding and baserunning. His fluke shin damage apart, is he proper up there with Soto as top-of-the-line gamers in the intervening time?
2:45
Ben Clemens: properly a technique of it’s simply projections. He has a 5.1 WAR projection over 672 PA. Soto is at 6.8 WAR in 686
2:46
Ben Clemens: Tucker’s WAR projection is fifteenth in baseball, in order that’s undoubtedly star degree
2:46
Ben Clemens: And for those who aren’t as bullish on the assorted defensive worth changes propping individuals up, you possibly can dock Cal Raleigh, Michael Harris, and William Contreras out of that listing and get him to twelfth
2:47
Ben Clemens: however let’s put it this fashion: in an abbreviated season, Tucker put up the perfect numbers of his profession, by 30+ factors of wRC+, and projection methods assume that in all probability he’s not abruptly that good on a go-forward foundation
2:48
Ben Clemens: in a full season, Soto put up the perfect full season of his profession (not so good as 2020 on a price foundation), however by meaningfully much less
2:48
Ben Clemens: and our projection methods assume he’ll be not too removed from the hitter he’s been most of his profession, although they appear to love his plate discipline-driven producdtion a little bit extra on a go-forward foundation
2:49
Ben Clemens: both means, each are nice. However the truth that SOto has 4 seasons higher than Tucker’s finest season, and is youthful, in all probability implies that Soto is best
2:49
Visitor: With a final place end, and one of many worst farm methods, ought to the Jays begin a hearth sale and attempt to get some worth for his or her prime property?
2:50
Ben Clemens: If Vlad isn’t desirous about an extension, then possibly
2:50
Ben Clemens: if he’s: you don’t get Vlads fairly often, possibly pay him and preserve making an attempt to win
2:50
Sir Nerdlington: how can the cubs ‘be going all in’ per the post-Tucker commerce reporting and but nonetheless deal with the CBT like a wage cap? It’s like we’re rooting for the brewers besides, ya know, with out the division titles.
2:50
Ben Clemens: No, the Brewers are means higher at maximizing their roster
2:51
Ben Clemens: however yeah, kinda wild imo
2:51
SPArn: Re: the what are they going to do, ask Tucker to DH/Happ to take a seat often, remark – I assume Tucker being an upcoming FA is a wrinkle in what I’m about to say, however are we… overrating the human factor there? Like, they’re handsomely paid… the Cubs ought to in all probability have the ability to ask them EXACTLY that lol. I really feel like we additionally simply discovered from the Reds that there’s no such factor as an excessive amount of depth/simply let these items work themselves out as a result of they seemingly will
2:51
Ben Clemens: okay so, you possibly can at all times strive that
2:51
Ben Clemens: one wrinkle is the funds factor
2:51
Ben Clemens: and clearly the Reds weren’t in love with their experiment b/c they went forward and traded India as quickly as they didn’t have urgent damage points
2:52
Ben Clemens: however the human factor issues! additionally they’re making an attempt arduous to re-sign Tucker and in addition presumably to seek out some contract extensions for younger and good gamers
2:52
Ben Clemens: they usually’d inevitably stunt PCA’s progress by doing this
2:52
Ben Clemens: one place the place the Reds differed is that it was fairly apparent who wanted probably the most enjoying time (Elly, McLain)
2:52
Ben Clemens: and people man shappened to be the younger gamers
2:53
Danny G100: I believe what I meant with the suzuki take was that Happ, PCA will preserve their jobs with Bellinger being traded.
2:53
Ben Clemens: so in the event that they commerce Bellinger, I assume issues get a little bit simpler
2:53
Ben Clemens: however that’s nonetheless certainly one of Seiya, Happ, or Tucker DH’ing a ton
2:53
Ben Clemens: Bellinger to the Yankees, possibly?
2:54
Leric A Ongenhagen: holy cow Cubbies. In the event that they land Luzardo, do you assume they personal the NLC? How would tank them towards all the NL if they’ve Luzardo?
2:54
Ben Clemens: Possibly I’m only a dummy, however touchdown Luzardo wouldn’t transfer the needle a lot for me in any respect
2:55
Ben Clemens: I’m not an enormous MIchael Busch believer, and for no matter cause I can’t speak myself into Hoerner regardless that I believe the info disagrees with me
2:55
Ben Clemens: however I do assume they’re co-favorites within the NLC with the Brewers
2:56
David Stearns: Pete Alonso doesn’t have a lot of a market does he simply return to the Mets on a Bellinger sort deal?
2:56
Ben Clemens: Yeah, I believe that’s within the playing cards, though “doesn’t have a lot of a market” is fairly theoretical at this level
2:56
Yukon Cornelius: Is Kerry Carpenter nearer to a future star or full time platoon participant?
2:56
Ben Clemens: i believe he’s nearer to a future star
2:56
Ben Clemens: I don’t assume he *IS* one, essentially
2:57
Ben Clemens: however for those who hit that properly towards righties, I’m gonna allow you to bat towards lefties too
2:57
DeeBo: Do you assume free agent market “greenback per WAR” calculations miss the purpose? I get how there’s a market common, however every staff’s personal {dollars}/WAR tolerance would appear to rely upon their funds + capacity to develop (low cost) expertise internally by way of the minors
2:59
Ben Clemens: I really wrote about this just a few years in the past
2:59
Bullock’s: Giants one way or the other solely at $167M for subsequent 12 months. They gotta get Burnes and get again within the playoffs, no?
2:59
Ben Clemens: I believe that they need to completely be making an attempt to make the playoffs
3:00
Ben Clemens: I believe that signing Burnes makes a whole lot of sense, too
3:00
Ben Clemens: and never simply selfishly b/c I need to watch him, although additionally that
3:00
J: Ginny Searle had a fairly good take at BP concerning the Seiya scenario. If Bellinger’s moved, between Tucker backing up CF on off days for PCA, Tucker and Happ DHing now and again, and inevitable accidents, Seiya can in all probability get 600ish innings within the OF at the same time as a main DH. It simply is determined by what number of innings he must be pleased.
3:00
Ben Clemens: Ginny’s stuff is nice, and I suppose that is smart if they will commerce Bellinger
3:01
Ben Clemens: in principle, Bellinger’s market might be not enormous
3:01
Ben Clemens: provided that he selected to remain on a participant choice
3:01
Ben Clemens: however possibly they will pay some down (hahahahha Cubs followers, enjoyable joke about your staff being cost-insensitive) or simply let him go for nothing?
3:01
Visitor: Additionally $/battle appears totally different for hitters and pitchers. Having one quantity doesn’t replicate that imo.
3:02
Ben Clemens: I’ve carried out some checking of this prior to now, and the true divide is relievers vs. different
3:02
Ben Clemens: beginning pitchers and hitters really are available fairly shut within the years I’ve checked
3:03
Dan Sanchez: On the subject of replicating the Burnes commerce, may the O’s get Stop or Valdez with a bundle like Kjerstad, Suarez and a draft decide or 45 FV prospect? Clearly Suarez isn’t as enticing as DL Corridor however he’s low cost rotation depth for a staff giving up a starter and Kjerstad appears like the fitting degree of headliner for rental?
3:03
Ben Clemens: I believe they might, that seems like an inexpensive return
3:03
Ben Clemens: I believe the Padres would in all probability try this in the event that they like Kjerstad
3:03
Bobby Peru: Is Verdugo washed already? The place does he go from right here?
3:03
Ben Clemens: yeah, washed imo
3:04
SeattleMarinersFan: Your ideas on Julio Rodriguez? He’s solely 23 yrs outdated however doesn’t appear to be a stud OF. Nonetheless room for enchancment?
3:04
Ben Clemens: I believe we’re seeing various things wanting on the similar man
3:04
Ben Clemens: He appears to be like like a stud OF to me
3:04
Statcast: Will EV90 ever be added to FG?
3:05
Ben Clemens: it’s on our listing of stuff, we de-prioritized it to focus extra on getting the assorted stuff metrics onto the positioning in helpful methods however I’ll carry it up once more in some unspecified time in the future b/c I actually prefer it as a stat
3:05
Visitor: If I’m making a visit to AZ for Spring Coaching, are there sure ballparks I ought to prioritize visiting?
3:05
Ben Clemens: I’m not probably the most educated, Eric is best, however: I like Salt River FIelds
3:05
Ben Clemens: I noticed Acuna hit a homer in AFL there as soon as, it was superior
3:05
Ben Clemens: noticed Nicky Lopez hit a homer too, it was a a lot much less spectacular homer
3:06
Colin: Do you assume $/WAR equals out between Def WAR and Off WAR as a result of possibly I’m unsuitable however I’d undoubtedly pay extra for Off WAR then Def WAR
3:06
Ben Clemens: Yeah, this I agree with
3:06
Ben Clemens: I believe that the market, fairly moderately, feels offensive battle is extra secure
3:06
Songbird’s Hay Den of Iniquity: What’s your tackle Hayden Birdsong? Giants of us appear to assume he’s obtained one other gear. Prospect hounds don’t appear so sanguine. What would you count on from the child over the following couple years?
3:07
Ben Clemens: I obtained some free tickets to a Giants sport final 12 months by way of a good friend and who was sitting in entrance of us? Birdsong’s total household, all sporting Birdsong jerseys
3:07
Ben Clemens: both that or only a ton of followers who all went REALLY out of their option to get a customized jersey of a rookie making his first begin
3:09
Ben Clemens: I believe that I’d be prepared to take a position on him having one other gear, it’s removed from a given and I perceive why he wasn’t an enormous, can’t miss prospect however he feels to me like a type of guys that might abruptly be a lot better if they might simply add a little bit command
3:09
Ben Clemens: it’s no provided that it’ll occur, however I like a number of of his pitches and his aggression. I simply assume the ball doesn’t go the place he desires typically sufficient for all of it to work but
3:09
Jim Bob Cooter: Is it protected to imagine that the Cubs aren’t even half means by way of their massive strikes?
3:09
Ben Clemens: when it comes to variety of trades, possibly
3:09
Ben Clemens: when it comes to complete impression, Tucker goes to be greater than half of the full strikes, so I’d say they’re greater than half by way of
3:10
Clen Bemens: Over/beneath Angels playoff over the following ten years: 0.5
3:10
Jamie: What do you consider the Woo rumors? The provide is outwardly Woo for Casas, Luis Guerrero, and Allan Castro
3:11
Ben Clemens: I don’t have an amazing cause for this, however I’ve been a little bit decrease than consensus on Woo
3:11
Ben Clemens: I don’t have a powerful view on Guerrero or Castro, both
3:11
Ben Clemens: so I’d say I’m in all probability the unsuitable individual to ask on this one… however I like Casas, and assume that he’s an inexpensive headliner for younger pitching if the throw-ins are fascinating to the staff buying and selling a pitcher
3:12
Bosoxforlife: The Pink Sox gained 81 video games final 12 months and simply added a key a part of the equation. I see them as contenders if Anthony or Campbell flip into Jackson Merrill, and do you see them getting something out of Giolito?
3:12
Ben Clemens: yeah, I believe they’re contenders for positive, partiuclarly after they add yet another hitter, which I believe they’ll do
3:14
Ben Clemens: actually arduous to know with Giolito
3:14
Ben Clemens: you must assume zero-ish given the damage timeline, however with enormous error bars
3:14
Jason N: Learn a rumor that Padres have been purchasing Bogaerts. I’m guessing he would approve a commerce again to Boston. Would a framework work round Bogaerts and stop for story, Casas and yoshida?
3:14
Ben Clemens: I have to be lacking one thing
3:14
Ben Clemens: why would the Padres do htis?
3:16
Ben Clemens: they’re buying and selling the perfect participant within the deal (Stop) and never even saving a lot cash
3:16
Ben Clemens: paying MORE cash within the quick time period
3:16
Ben Clemens: Story is fairly clearly worse than Bogaerts for 2025
3:16
Ben Clemens: Yoshida is at finest a query mark
3:17
Ben Clemens: this commerce would make the Padres so much worse within the quick time period, it’d create an ungainly positional logjam at first/DH, and it might contain buying and selling a pitcher they’re hoping will get them prospect or pivot piece to one way or the other make shortstop worse?
3:18
DeeBo: You’d count on a few jersey numbers to be retired in case your staff makes 7 straight ALCS and wins two World Collection. After this newest run, anybody apart from Altuve and probably Yordan get theirs retired by the Astros?
3:18
Ben Clemens: like undoubtedly him
3:19
Ben Clemens: possibly Verlander, he felt like a key a part of these runs
3:19
John B: I’ve been massive on Josh Naylor to the Giants, possibly for a few mid degree SP prospects. Does this make sense to you?
3:19
Ben Clemens: It doesn’t actually, for 2 causes. One, I’m simply not a Naylor believer. This may occasionally or will not be rational
3:20
Ben Clemens: two, I believe LaMonte Wade does a whole lot of what he does, and arguably higher
3:20
Ben Clemens: however at worst, at an analogous degree
3:21
Ben Clemens: I believe that the Giants can be higher served to deal with their rotation or maybe attempt to get one other star outfielder to pair with Ramos flanking JHL in heart
3:22
Ben Clemens: and provided that the farm isn’t wildly deep, buying and selling significant items for a 1b/DH feels prefer it’s a stretch
3:22
RMR: How do you assume groups course of the not-trading-in-the-division standard knowledge? Tie-breaker? Demand extra worth? Simply don’t take into account it? Would like to see Suzuki in Cincinnati.
3:22
Ben Clemens: I believe it’s a tiebreaker, or near it
3:23
Ben Clemens: I may see that commerce figuring out possibly, it actually is determined by what the Cubs need to do. I believe that shifting Bellinger would occur first most certainly
3:23
Bosoxforlife: Few issues have shocked me greater than the value of mediocre pitching this low season. I assumed that the Giolito deal final winter couldn’t be topped however $67 million for Severino has challenged it and that is with starters getting used principally as not far more than openers. It’s loopy.
3:23
Ben Clemens: Severino in all probability obtained an A’s enhance, however even together with him, I’m with you
3:23
josh: ought to/will the tigers make a transfer to consolidate expertise right into a 3-win participant? given the abundance of younger function gamers and lack of above-average regulars (esp within the infield), and in addition the cash to spend on a FA in the event that they vacate a beginning roster spot, this appears like a should in the event that they’re severe about competing
3:24
Ben Clemens: they need to have gone nuts making an attempt to get Kyle Tucker, and doubtless they did
3:24
Ben Clemens: ‘consolidate expertise right into a 3-win participant’ is an admirable aim
3:24
Ben Clemens: possibly it’s Bo Bichette?
3:25
Ben Clemens: however in wanting by way of our projections, I’m making an attempt to assume which of those guys are on the block, and eh…. Bichette, possibly Yandy Diaz who doesn’t actually really feel like a star, and nobody else who appears more likely to be on the commerce block
3:26
Ben Clemens: so sure, I believe that they need to put money into having extra stars on their staff, significantly through commerce
3:26
Ben Clemens: I simply assume that may be a powerful needle to string
3:26
Ben Clemens: on that notice: time to go decide up some lunch
3:26
Ben Clemens: and hten again to digging by way of outdated prospect lists for a enjoyable article I’m engaged on
3:26
Ben Clemens: have an exquisite week, everybody, and an exquisite vacation season