A Florida jury on Monday awarded Jack Nicklaus $50 million in his defamation lawsuit in opposition to Nicklaus Firms, which is owned by billionaire banker Howard Milstein.
Nicklaus, 85, filed the lawsuit in response to statements that Milstein and different Nicklaus Firms officers made in a earlier lawsuit in a New York court docket.
Within the defamation lawsuit, Nicklaus claimed the defendants steered that he had thought-about a $750 million deal to develop into the face of the Saudi Arabian-financed LIV Golf League and disseminated these false claims to media retailers.
“It is all the time arduous in a defamation case to show damages to fame, as a result of particularly for a man like Jack, it is all the time such one,” Nicklaus’ legal professional, Eugene Stearns, informed ESPN on Monday. “However I believe what was essential was the dispute that arose 3½ years in the past when the corporate informed the world that Jack was promoting out the PGA Tour for the Saudi golf, when it was not true. So, we’re comfortable that Jack’s been vindicated.”
In court docket paperwork, the golfer’s attorneys wrote {that a} Nicklaus Firms official requested him to satisfy with Golf Saudi representatives in 2021 about designing a golf course in Saudi Arabia. Throughout that assembly, Nicklaus discovered that Golf Saudi wished him to simply accept a management function in LIV Golf.
“In response to Nicklaus, he had little interest in the provide and declined as a result of he felt the PGA Tour was an essential a part of his legacy, and if the PGA was not in favor of a brand new league, he didn’t wish to be concerned,” the court docket paperwork mentioned.
Nicklaus claimed the defendants additionally alleged he wasn’t mentally match to handle his enterprise affairs and was affected by dementia.
“What they mentioned was, ‘You want to have the keys taken away,'” Stearns mentioned. “However the mixture of all of that was unlucky, and we’re comfortable that that is all quickly going to be behind Jack, and hopefully the Nicklaus Firms will do fantastic, as properly. But it surely was an unlucky incident, and hopefully now it is over.”
In response to the Palm Seaside Publish, the jury dominated that Nicklaus Firms actively participated within the false publishing of details that broken the 18-time main champion’s fame and uncovered him to “ridicule, hatred, distrust, mistrust or contempt.”
The Publish additionally reported the jury dominated in favor of Milstein and Nicklaus Firms govt Andrew O’Brien not being held personally liable.
Nicklaus Firms mentioned it paid the legendary golfer $145 million in Could 2007 for unique rights to his golf course design companies and advertising, promotional and branding rights.
Nicklaus resigned from the corporate in 2017, triggering a five-year noncompete clause within the deal that prevented him from designing golf programs on his personal. Nicklaus stepped down from the corporate’s board in Could 2022.
Not lengthy after, Nicklaus Firms sued Nicklaus and his firm GBI Traders, alleging tortious interference, breach of contract and breach of judiciary obligation in opposition to Nicklaus. The grievance alleged that Nicklaus had diverted alternatives away from Nicklaus Firms for his private profit.
On the time of that lawsuit, Nicklaus mentioned in a press release: “The claims made by Howard Milstein are unfaithful. Our relationship has been a troublesome one, at finest. I’ve little doubt in regards to the final result, however I do not intend to make this a public spectacle, if it may be prevented.”
A Florida arbitrator dominated in July 2024 that Nicklaus was now not restricted by the noncompete clause and was free to design golf programs.
In April, New York Civil Division Supreme Court docket Justice Joel M. Cohen dominated that Nicklaus had the proper to make use of his personal identify, picture and likeness, whereas Nicklaus Firms owned the emblems it bought and will proceed to promote attire and tools with Nicklaus’ identify, “Golden Bear” moniker and logos.
