Over the subsequent two weeks, as I end watching prospects for this draft, I’ll launch a few of my place tiers for this draft. Subsequent week, I’ll submit my full horizontal massive board. Here’s a hyperlink to my final submit evaluating defensive ends.
The tiers
I watched 19 defensive tackles on this draft class. As a reminder, right here is how I tier gamers:
Prime-10: Day 1 star, among the finest gamers at his place, resets the market when signing a second contract. Constant All-Professional participant.
First spherical: Blue-chip participant, foundational a part of your crew. Makes Professional Bowl groups, doesn’t essentially reset the market when signing an extension, however constantly within the higher tier of contracts/rankings.
Second spherical: An above-average starter that you simply reward with a great second contract. Perhaps makes one or two Professional Bowls. Not a star or constructing block, however rounds out your crew.
Third spherical: Common starter — a high quality participant for whom you received’t essentially pay a giant second contract.
Fourth spherical: A fringe starter or rotational participant. Has a narrower position in comparison with your higher gamers.
Day 3: A fringe roster or follow squad participant. I don’t have any Day 3 grades on this group from the listing I watched.
Let’s get began.
Prime 10
First spherical
Mason Graham, Michigan
Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Walter Nolen, Ole Miss
Kenneth Grant, Michigan
Participant Highlight: Kenneth Grant
I’ve written profiles on each Derrick Harmon and Walter Nolen, so hit these hyperlinks if you would like my ideas on each.
I’m a bit decrease on Graham than the consensus. I feel he’s going to be a very good starter that makes Professional Bowl groups, however I discover his ceiling decrease than most. He’s undersized and with out top-tier athleticism. He’s an superior run defender and a high quality go rusher, however I don’t see the ceiling to say he’s a particular All-Professional participant, which is required for me to present him a top-10 grade.
Regardless, Graham received’t be in vary for the Chiefs. Kenneth Grant may. Nostril sort out prospects are usually my favorites — and I usually find yourself overrating them. Nevertheless, it’s laborious to not watch Grant’s tape and get excited.
As a run defender, he checks all of the packing containers — elite measurement, good size, requisite pad degree to win leverage. He can tackle double groups and anchor properly, but in addition transfer his ft laterally on zone blocks. Grant is usually a plugger for any crew.
What makes Grant intriguing is his pass-rush upside. With most nostril tackles, go rush talent tends to be theoretical, however not for Grant. Grant has a great first step and agile ft to win with quickness. He can shoot a niche and win upfield. His bag of strikes is already well-developed for a nostril sort out. He won’t ever be a 10-sack man, however for a nostril sort out, he’ll be a presence as a go rusher.
The rationale I purchase Grant as a protected choice is that I feel he performs with an awesome motor. Even on a nasty Michigan crew, Grant performed laborious by way of each sport. I by no means questioned his motor and energy. I see no points together with his form or taking part in loads of snaps, which is massive for his projection.
Kenneth Grant is a MENACE on the middle of a protection.
He continuously attracts double groups however has nonetheless managed 8 sacks, 50 pressures, and 39 run stops within the final two seasons.
He’s all of 6’3, 342lbs and is an INCREDIBLE athlete at that measurement. May find yourself a high 10 decide. pic.twitter.com/ugjrmahM6Z
— NFL Draft Information (@NFL_DF) January 31, 2025
Second spherical
Participant Highlight: Shemar Turner
I’ve given ideas on Sanders and Williams, so let’s speak Turner.
I had bother rating Turner; I oscillated between Spherical 2 and three. Turner is a powerful athlete. His velocity, explosiveness and measurement are all spectacular. He has elite traits to be a disruptive go rusher. When Turner is taking part in properly, his high-end reps look extremely spectacular.
That being mentioned, I feel he wants some teaching. I don’t query his effort, however I feel he wants extra work on pass-rush strikes. He works laborious to play upfield, however doesn’t all the time use approach to get there.
As a run defender, Turner reveals sufficient good reps to get excited. He’s good in opposition to zone blocks going laterally. Double groups might give him some issues, however he reveals good pad degree and leverage to set his anchor. I see him extra as a three-technique.
Turner has some tough moments, however his high-end expertise and motor are value taking top-50.
Texas A&M DT Shemar Turner (6-3, 290) has some violent hand pop and block shedding, and is a menace as a run stopper. Manufacturing dipped from ’23 to ’24, however he is a bodily presence that performed from nostril to 5-tech within the Aggies protection.
Performs with a scorching motor too. pic.twitter.com/91vTUtqo3g
— Devin Jackson (@RealD_Jackson) April 2, 2025
Third spherical
Darius Alexander, Toledo
Alfred Collins, Texas
Deone Walker, Kentucky
Vernon Broughton, Texas
Participant Highlight: Deone Walker
Walker is without doubt one of the most polarizing gamers within the class. His movie both oscillates between being high 10 and Day 3.
His high-end reps are loopy. For a man together with his body, the agility and burst he reveals getting upfield is insane. There are moments the place he dominates video games and appears like among the finest gamers within the nation.
The problem? His motor isn’t constant. He performs with a really excessive pad degree and struggles to decrease his middle of gravity. His get-off may be poor. When Walker isn’t operating scorching, he’s close to unplayable.
I picked Walker within the third spherical as a result of, with good teaching, in principle, he might be a star, however he may also flame out. You can inform me any profession final result for him, and I’d imagine it.
Fourth spherical
Ty Hamilton, Ohio State
Nazir Stackhouse, Georgia
Howard Cross III, Notre Dame
Joshua Farmer, Florida State
Omarr Norman-Latt, Tennessee
Ty Robinson, Nebraska
Participant Highlight: Howard Cross III
Cross may be very undersized, however I nonetheless like his upside as a rotational go rusher. He lacks the scale to ever play on run downs, however his go rush movie excites me. He wins with quickness and agility. He can flip a decent arc on the inside and shoot gaps to get into the backfield. He can fireplace his palms into blockers and use a bull rush. Cross is agile sufficient to slant and be used on stunts.
If you happen to’re a crew in search of go rush juice from the inside, Cross might be a great worth. He’s going to be 24 and can all the time have a restricted position, however it’s laborious to search out pass-rush juice, and Cross has loads of it.
Day 3
Riley Mills, Notre Dame
Jordan Phillips, Maryland